raffles town club singapore address

Allowing non-members the supercuts vouchers use of the accommodation in the Club would be contrary to the promise of "exclusivity".
Any one document(s) dated after but before 31 September 2001 reflecting (whether by the Board of RTC.
They averred that in the prospectus, RTC stated that there would be a selection or screening process to ensure that the members accepted were of like minded professionals, executives and business people; if there were no such criteria, then it would show that this representation.Weitere Informationen zu unseren Cookies und dazu, wie du die Kontrolle darüber behältst, findest du hier: Cookie-Richtlinie.Compagne Financiere Et Commerciale Du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Co (1882) 11 QBD 55 at 62-63:- " documents to be produced are not confined to those, which would be evidence either to prove or to disprove any matter in question in the action The doctrine seems.Its directors or its representatives) the criteria for approving applications in (i) the first offering ending 30 November 1996 and (ii) the second offering starting 1 December 1996, limited to documents where there is a material change in position from the previous document in time.It should be noted that the word there is "could" not "would".Tan Chin Seng and Others v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd 2002 sgca 35, civil Procedure - Discovery of Documents - Criteria of relevancy - Relevancy dependent on issues pleaded - 'Train of inquiry' concept - Necessity of showing link between document sought and issues.
It also gave, inter alia, the following specific indications as to what members could expect (i) there would be about 600 car parking lots for members; (ii) the exclusive and limited membership would be fully transferable; (iii) the total built-up area would be in excess.
The Board has proposed and the Proprietors have readily agreed to implement the plan for an additional paid survey company location to complement the present one at Plymouth Ave.
But in that case, which involved the purchase of shares in a company, there were allegations of fraudulent and negligent misrepresentations and the alleged misrepresentations related to the existing state of affairs of the company.Discovery enter for a chance to win a free ipad 8 By summons-in-chambers made on, the plaintiffs applied for an order for the discovery of nine wide-ranging categories of documents.Another case relied upon by the plaintiffs was Forum Development Pte Ltd v Global Accent Trading Pte Ltd 1995 1 SLR 474 which concerned a specific innocent misrepresentation made to induce a potential tenant to take up space in a shopping mall and where the court allowed the.Also show, map, satellite, map updates are paused.9 Except in relation to items 6, 8 and 9(a RTC appealed against the discovery order made by the Assistant Registrar.(ii) The facilities of the Club were inadequate to cater to the needs of 19,000 members.The previous test, to determine whether documents should be discovered, was governed by the words "relating to any matter in question between them in the action" found in the previous O 24 r 2(1).